<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>dancepulse &#187; audience</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dancepulse.org/tag/audience/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dancepulse.org</link>
	<description>make your day dance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2012 04:51:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>SYTYCD: so you thought you could disregard&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://dancepulse.org/2009/07/24/sytycd/</link>
		<comments>http://dancepulse.org/2009/07/24/sytycd/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 16:00:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>megrm</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[audience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[choreography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[performance]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dancepulse.wordpress.com/?p=437</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[disregard vb. 1. to give little or no attention to; ignore.  2. to treat as unworthy of consideration or respect. So You Think You Can Dance has been going on for 5 years now, but I&#8217;ve only just hopped on the bandwagon.  Despite having seen it once or twice a couple years ago  &#8212; and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>disregard vb. 1. to give little or no attention to; ignore.  2. to treat as unworthy of consideration or respect.</p>
<p><em><a href="http://">So You Think You Can Dance</a> </em>has been going on for 5 years now, but I&#8217;ve only just hopped on the bandwagon.  Despite having seen it once or twice a couple years ago  &#8212; and appreciated the fact that the dances are really good because they use good choreographers! &#8212; it&#8217;s taken me this long to join the audience for a couple reasons: 1. I don&#8217;t generally support the idea of dance as a competitive activity, &amp; 2. I don&#8217;t watch much TV, so I couldn&#8217;t remember to turn it on.</p>
<p>But it&#8217;s summer vacation,  I&#8217;ve been watching for 3 weeks (that&#8217;s 6 shows) &amp; I&#8217;m a fan! These are things I like:</p>
<ul>
<li>There&#8217;s great choreography, with a focus on the expressive power of dance &amp; dancers;</li>
<li>It&#8217;s a good showcase for all styles of dance;</li>
<li>Meaning takes priority over style &#8212; you quit caring whether it&#8217;s ballet, modern or hiphop because you&#8217;re caught by the dance;</li>
<li>Respect is front and center &#8212; respect for dance styles, choreographers, the audience, family members, and especially for the contestants (even as contestants lose, the show features footage of their best moments, and the contestants themselves appear grateful for what they&#8217;ve gained &#8212; no coverage of them walking sadly out the door, with bitter words);</li>
<li>Cooperation &amp; mutual respect &#8212; key players in the dance world &#8212; are apparent.</li>
<li>They found a place for <a href="http://www.comcast.net/video/ellen-degeneres-sytycd-silliness/1192452904/fanTV/popular/">Ellen Degeneres </a>as a judge, and she was fabulous &#8212; human, humorous &amp; humble!</li>
</ul>
<p>I do have some bones to pick:</p>
<ul>
<li>Why on earth do dancers/choreographers refer to dances &amp; choreography as <em>routines</em>?!  Yes, one of the definitions of the word is as &#8220;a set sequence of dance steps,&#8221; but the first definition is &#8220;a usual or regular method of procedure, esp. one that is unvarying.&#8221; So even when the word <em>routine </em>means <em>&#8220;</em>dance steps,&#8221; it connotes &#8220;boring.&#8221;</li>
<li>The televised audition phase of SYTYCD (which again, I haven&#8217;t seen much of, but that doesn&#8217;t prevent me from forming an opinion!) is less respectful than the actual competition, with more time spent on the usual histrionics of reality-TV.</li>
<li>I often don&#8217;t agree with the voting audience.  But then, I&#8217;m not voting yet, so what&#8217;s my beef?</li>
</ul>
<p>Regardless, I&#8217;m finding the art  more important than the competition in SYTYCD, &amp; I now have a TV show that I remember to turn on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dancepulse.org/2009/07/24/sytycd/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Training the audience</title>
		<link>http://dancepulse.org/2009/06/17/training-the-audience/</link>
		<comments>http://dancepulse.org/2009/06/17/training-the-audience/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 06:30:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>megrm</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[audience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chaos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obstacles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[performance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[problems]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dancepulse.wordpress.com/?p=382</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Audience norms are really different, depending on the event.  Golf: total silence for the swing.  Ballet: silence with applause following fantastic turns and jumps.  Modern: silence, even following fantastic turns and jumps. Baseball: general conversation, cell phones &#38; folks hawking food, but don&#8217;t disturb your neighbor during a play, and be ready to cheer wildly [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Audience norms are really different, depending on the event.  Golf: total silence for the swing.  Ballet: silence with applause following fantastic turns and jumps.  Modern: silence, even following fantastic turns and jumps. Baseball: general conversation, cell phones &amp; folks hawking food, but don&#8217;t disturb your neighbor during a play, and be ready to cheer wildly at a moment&#8217;s notice.  Church: depending on the flavor, audience participation ranges from mumbled responses to loud exhortations.  Symphony: total silence, especially between two parts in a series &#8212; don&#8217;t applaud until <span style="text-decoration:underline;">eveyone</span> else does.  School performance: cell phones, conversations, babies crying, people talking, with possibly wild cheers whenever the featured performer (the child they&#8217;ve come to see) comes on stage!?</p>
<p>Ideally, standards for the audience at the kids&#8217; performance would be the same standards we teach our kids &#8212; pegged as the 4 A&#8217;s of Audience Participation in Anne Gilbert&#8217;s <a href="http://www.creativedance.org/store/">Brain-Compatible Dance Education</a>:</p>
<p>Attend, Allow, Applaud, Appreciate</p>
<p>Which translates as Pay attention to everyone even if it&#8217;s not your child; Allow the kids to do their best by not distracting them with noise &amp; confusion; Applaud when they&#8217;re done; &amp; Appreciate them later by telling them what they did fabulously.</p>
<p>No harm in briefing your parents on the same standards the students have learned &#8212; ostenstibly so they&#8217;ll know what the kids are learning. Meanwhile, maybe they&#8217;ll take a hint.</p>
<p>Other strategies:</p>
<p>Spend some time with the kids working up a rubric for what good performers do and then share the rubric with parents, so they&#8217;ll have a context for appreciating their children. Post it in written form, so you can brief them very quickly &#8212; which saves time and leaves it available as a reference. This approach gives them something to think about&#8230;</p>
<p>Provide program notes to clarify the origin and details about the piece students are performing, what they learned from it, and how they built it.  The context may help them focus.</p>
<p>Ask the parents for help in the form of quiet listening &#8212; explain that the kids are working really hard on concentrating and being heard, and the audience can help them succeed.</p>
<p>Make the same pre-performance announcement about cell phones that other performance venues do&#8230; or at least ask folks to take their call outside if it&#8217;s important.  In the same vein, request that parents keep small siblings off the stage and with them, for everyone&#8217;s safety.</p>
<p>Plant some allies along the sidelines (teachers? the principal?) to remind the worst offenders.</p>
<p>Results are best when proactive rather than reactive. Once the noise starts, it&#8217;s hard to stop.  Use a different strategy each time, and repeat the ones that work. Hopefully, the audience will gradually improve to meet standards &#8212; allowing everyone&#8217;s kid to do their best by giving quiet attention and applause!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dancepulse.org/2009/06/17/training-the-audience/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Guest voice: Post-performance blues</title>
		<link>http://dancepulse.org/2009/06/13/performance-post-performance-blues-audience/</link>
		<comments>http://dancepulse.org/2009/06/13/performance-post-performance-blues-audience/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2009 18:22:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>megrm</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Guest Voices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[audience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chaos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[curriculum integration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obstacles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[performance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[problems]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dancepulse.wordpress.com/?p=378</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s been my hope &#38; intention that this blog might be a means for myself and others to converse with each other from our isolated locations as dance educators.  All for the purpose of sharing ideas, anxieties, questions, solutions, hopes, and humor as we hone our skills for the daily diet of dance we serve.  [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>It&#8217;s been my hope &amp; intention that this blog might be a means for myself and others to converse with each other from our isolated locations as dance educators.  All for the purpose of sharing ideas, anxieties, questions, solutions, hopes, and humor as we hone our skills for the daily diet of dance we serve.  In that spirit, I&#8217;d like to introduce Katie Wood, a music specialist who integrates dance, and whose comment following <a href="http://dancepulse.wordpress.com/2009/06/07/performance-logistics-yearend/">my last blog</a> appears here as a Guest Voice, expressing some familiar post-performance anxieties. Thank you, Katie, for sharing such fresh thoughts!<br />
</em></p>
<p><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><strong>Post-Performance Sleeplessness from Katie Wood</strong></span></p>
<div>
<p>Wow – I have so much spinning through my own mind right now, that it is 2 am and I am up from my bed to calm my thoughts. Cannot sleep.</p>
<p>We performed tonight. More on that in a bit.</p>
<p>Of late, I&#8217;ve been preparing my OWN 325 performers to tell folktales from around the world through music and movement. We incorporated storytelling with singing, playing instruments, drama and dance. Whew! What an exciting thing &#8212; watching your students begin to take the lead, &#8230;when you as a teacher are able to let go and the kids take over. In that moment when you know you’ve done the best you can do.</p>
<p>I faced some challenges. I think my 2nd graders were bored for a while (too much repetition) while my 1st graders could not get enough! 3rd grade came together at the last minute, with energy and enthusiasm, and 4th graders were refining and refining and refining. I learned the importance of stepping back, and stepping in, and of taking things apart to put them back together in a more thoughtful and complete way. I learned how to teach a musical concept by exploring it first, then defining (and refining and refining and refining).</p>
<p>Wow, the kids taught me a LOT this year.</p>
<p>We performed this evening. The turn out was unpredictable, so all kids had practiced each part (musical and otherwise) in order to be ready for anything. I think this helped kids to see the big picture, but left me feeling a bit scattered, assigning parts in the moment. It worked, but not 100% smoothly.</p>
<p>4th grade was NERVOUS. Perhaps they should not be first next time?  2nd grade was small, but what a difference an audience made for them. And I felt the most connected to this group as they performed. We had fun. 1st grade came out in droves. And the audience behavior was horrid.</p>
<p>I am horrified at the effect of a noisy audience on my students. Adults began to chatter (were they on their cell phones – really!???!!!!!) and the volume increased… until my 1st grade students, the most excited (and most throughly prepared group), began to check out and chatter themselves.</p>
<p>Now I am no fool. I stood there thinking, “OK – maybe this is too long… the pacing is off… the kids are too spread out… good for the classroom, maybe too much for a performance?… what is going on?… these are first graders people – you need to LISTEN!!!!!”</p>
<p>I am shocked and appauled at this problem, which I have run into more than once during performances now. Last year, it was a spring musical. In the gym. Kids (not students) running – RUNNING – across the “stage” unattended while we performed. Audience talking nonstop. I had to stop the show twice.</p>
<p>This year, I tried the cafeteria. Better for the winter program, but still a lot of chatter. I addressed this BEFORE the program. And DURING. My own students (grade 5) were some of the worst culprits!</p>
<p>This time, the audience behavior affected the performers. They lost focus, momentum, and I nearly lost my cool. I stopped the performance to regain the audience’s attention. But it was never the same. My third graders were able to pull a bit more focus from the audience, but transitions were a challenge. And since about half of my kids didn’t show up, we had to make adjustments on the fly, which didn’t help the flow, to say the least.</p>
<p>The kids did great, made adjustments when necessary and really gave it their all. WHY did the audience fail us? What can I do to address this problem? I’m lying awake thinking I may need to forget about evening performances altogether, or just keep it to a “class” perfromance in my classroom – which has been more successful in the past (smaller, more intimate – more proximity to the kids AND the ADULTS!!!). What a difference a stage could make, with lighting – I think maybe that could help??? I am at a loss, and now I’ve lost sleep over it. Any thoughts??</p>
<p><em>Many thanks, Katie, since I&#8217;ve faced similar difficulties. </em><em>I&#8217;m still ruminating about these audience issues and will share my thoughts here soon&#8230; Thanks for expressing your post-performance thoughts so immediately!<br />
</em></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dancepulse.org/2009/06/13/performance-post-performance-blues-audience/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

